proton:license
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| proton:license [2012/07/31 00:01] – seth | proton:license [2018/07/28 07:14] (current) – seth | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| Some of the libraries Proton may link to may have additional requirements or restrictions. | Some of the libraries Proton may link to may have additional requirements or restrictions. | ||
| + | === Attribution a problem? | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you absolutely can't include the one line attribution text somewhere in your about or credits, you can license a "no attribution" | ||
| === Why that bsd license and not GPL or zlib? === | === Why that bsd license and not GPL or zlib? === | ||
| Line 29: | Line 32: | ||
| Here is the reasoning: | Here is the reasoning: | ||
| - | * A GPL/LGPL license removes the ability to protect and hide your private code and introduces various licensing limitations concerning | + | * A GPL/LGPL license removes the ability to protect and hide your private code and introduces various licensing limitations concerning |
| - | * If Proton was zlib free, someone would eventually GPL a branch and start adding features to it, which could not be shared with the main distribution which has a much more open license. | + | * If Proton was zlib free, someone would eventually GPL a branch and start adding features to it, which could not be shared with the main distribution which has a much more open license. |
| - | * | + | * The no attribution license for a fee option allows someone to use Proton in a place where attribution is impossible/ |
| - | * The no attribution license for a fee option allows someone to use Proton in a place where attribution is impossible/ | + | |
proton/license.1343692863.txt.gz · Last modified: by seth
